665 documents, 2,292 structured claims, 2,572 graph nodes across 291 clusters.
drag to move · scroll to zoom · hover a node
And an MCP layer on top, so an assistant can query the graph directly, not just look at it.
You may already know both. The point isn’t the findings themselves; it’s that a graph surfaced them across 665 articles, the demo transcripts, and the MCP docs without anyone re-reading a word. I’m flagging them the way I would have from the inside.
The same eligibility sentence is hand-maintained across dozens of articles. When packaging shifts, each copy has to be found and changed by hand, and the drift leaves an agent unsure what they’re even allowed to use.
Verbatim count of the gating sentence by feature area, reproducible via grep over the corpus.
Some capabilities are documented by what they restrict, not what they enable. An agent reading “you can only mass-email strong relationships” meets a rule, not the deliverability protection behind it. The what travels through the docs; the why doesn’t.
The way things ended stung. It was handled well and the reasons were real, but it still stung.
Here's my share of it. I knew things I didn't say out loud. When a brokerage asked for one thing and my gut said they needed something else, I usually went with what they asked for, because pushing back meant trusting my own read, and I didn't. Even when I did speak up, I had a hard time shaping what I saw into something the team could run with. When I wasn't sure how to answer something, I'd let it wait instead of getting ahead of it. None of that was about effort. The confidence just wasn't there.
Building these things is part of what changed that. It gave me a way to test my own thinking before I bring it to anyone, and to get what I see in front of people clearly. The rest was quieter, and harder to point at: time, distance, and some honest work on how I'd been getting in my own way. I trust my instincts now because I can finally check them, and because I stopped talking myself out of them.
Not a roadmap. Just the bets I'd make. You're probably already thinking about some of these, and that's kind of the point: so am I.
I built it over the months since. It runs on the same local-first, single-source-of-truth instinct you already know, turned on my own work: a self-maintaining knowledge base, a fleet of specialist agents, automations that run unattended, and a private local model for anything sensitive. The Cloze graph above is just the piece I pointed at you.
I spent a long time not trusting what I saw. This is what it looks like when I do.
If any of it's useful to you, it's yours. Either way, I'm glad I made it.